![]() Elden will get some, but not all, of the money’s he’s looking for, and the Nevermind cover will remain unchanged. Now, I am obviously not Dave Grohl or a member of Nirvana’s inner circle, but my read on his lackadaisical tone is that he knows what we’ve all known pretty much since the lawsuit was filed - it’s gonna end in a settlement. Elden, who appeared on the artwork for the band’s second album when he was a baby, initially sued Nirvana in August last year for failing to take reasonable. And, fortunately, I don’t have to do the paperwork.” Lawyers acting for Nirvana have asked a judge to dismiss the second amended complaint filed by Spencer Elden over their Nevermind cover art. “I think that there’s much more to look forward to and much more to life than getting bogged down in those kinds of things. Elden has openly criticized the use of his naked baby photo on Nirvanas album which may explain why some have been spurred to cancel the Nevermind cover. I’m sure we’ll come up with something good.”Īsked how lawsuit could be resolved, Grohl continued: Bad weather, bad swimming pool, cloudy water, Weddle recalled in 2011. “I have many ideas of how we should alter that cover, but we’ll see what happens. The 1991 day photographer Kirk Weddle shot Nirvana’s Nevermind album cover was not necessarily a pleasant one. ![]() The Sunday Times recently asked former Nirvana drummer and current Foo Fighters frontman Dave Grohl about the lawsuit and what the band will do if they lose, and he seemed none-too-worried about it: ![]() People who have never listened to Nevermind know the cover image. Spencer Elden recreates his pose from the cover of Nirvanas album Nevermind, shot when he was a baby, 25 years later. What would that mean for Nirvana? After all, Nevermind has, inarguably, one of the most iconic covers of all time. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |